keli 
81.3% of software companies still offer Time & Material pricing models, while 65.6% provide fixed price contracts.
With these trends in mind, let’s explore which model, Fixed Cost Software Development or Time & Material works best for US startups depending on their objectives, budget, and growth stage.
What Is Fixed Cost Software Development?
It’s is a project pricing model where the total cost of the software project is agreed upon upfront, often before work begins. The development partner takes on most of the risk if the timeline, scope, or costs change after the contract is signed.
This model works best when:
- Project specs are fully detailed and unlikely to change,
- Startups want budget certainty, and
- Deliverables are fully understood from the beginning.
Fixed Cost Software Development Services are most commonly offered by agencies that have standardized workflows and strong project estimation capabilities often used for smaller apps, MVPs with clear requirements, or short-term feature builds.
What Is Time & Material Pricing?
Studies find that around 70% of software projects benefit from flexible pricing like Time & Material because they handle evolving requirements better. In a Time & Material model, you pay for the actual hours spent and resources used during development. This offers more flexibility and room for scope evolution.
Instead of guessing final costs up front, your development team bills monthly or per sprint based on real work done, so the project can adjust dynamically if new needs emerge.
Comparing Fixed Cost vs Time & Material
Here’s how each model stacks up across key startup concerns:
- It Offers predictable budgeting, startups know exact cost before signing.
- Ideal when funding is tight or when planning investor budgets.
- But if scope wasn’t fully understood, change requests can get expensive.
| Factor | Fixed Cost | Time & Material |
| Budget Predictability | High – Cost agreed upfront | Low – Costs vary based on actual work |
| Flexibility | Low – Scope changes are costly | High – Adapts to evolving requirements |
| Speed to Market | Slower if changes occur | Faster – Agile iterations possible |
| Risk Allocation | Vendor bears most risk | Shared between startup and vendor |
| Best For | Small, well-defined projects | Complex, evolving, or MVP-driven projects |
1. Time & Material:
- Costs vary with actual work done, no overpaying for idle time.
- Realistic for projects where requirements might evolve after testing or market feedback
- Budget ceilings are not guaranteed, and if not managed, costs can balloon.
Startups with strict financial constraints benefit from Fixed Cost Software Development Services, while those willing to adjust expenses based on evolving goals may find Time & Material more flexible.
2. Requirement Stability & Flexibility
These Services shine when you know exactly what you want and aren’t planning to pivot features midway. Early stage founders often dream this is possible, but in reality, product requirements change as startups test hypotheses. Time & Material excels when requirements are uncertain and expected to grow.
Agile development is planned because sprints, prototypes, and rapid changes.
For most fast-moving startups, Time & Material offers creative latitude that strict fixed pricing simply can’t match.
3. Speed of Delivery & Market Fit
Startups racing to market often need to build features incrementally, launching an MVP and expanding based on real user behavior.
Time & Material allows teams to begin development with rough plans, refining goals as insights arrive.
If your priority is speed and iteration, Time & Material frequently helps startups reach market faster while refining product value step by step.
4. Risk Allocation
It thrusts most risk onto the development service provider. This seems good for the startup but can lead to:
- padding estimates,
- rushed delivery, or
- hidden quality compromises when edge cases surface late.
In contrast, Time & Material makes the startup share more risk by paying actual costs, but it also encourages mutual collaboration between the startup and developers.
When Fixed Cost Works Best?
Startups should consider following things when:
- They have a small, well-scoped project (e.g., simple app or internal tool).
- Investor budgets require predictable costs.
- They possess detailed specifications and won’t expect many pivots.
Examples
• Simple marketing sites
• Well-defined backend workflows
• Clearly scoped API integrations
In these cases, Fixed Cost Software Development Services can make planning easier and financing more transparent.
When Time & Material Dominates
- Time & Material is generally better for:
- Evolving platforms or complex products.
- MVPs where early user feedback will shape future builds.
- Agile teams that iterate in sprints.
- Projects where feature scope cannot be locked down at the start.
This is often the case for most US startups building SaaS apps, mobile products, or platforms where user behavior dictates roadmap changes.
According to industry data, most software projects (around 70%) benefit from Time & Material because requirements change during development.
Final Takeaway
If your startup is fast-paced, growing, and your product vision will evolve, Time & Material usually delivers greater agility, flexibility, and real world responsiveness.
Many startups start with Time & Material for MVPs, then transition to fixed budget work for later phases once product outcomes are better understood.
At CodeSuite, fixed-price scoping is a key part of our business strategy—and it could be the same for you.
Ready to take the plunge? With careful planning, clear communication, a bit of padding, and the right tools, you’ll be well on your way to offering accurate and fair fixed-price quotes, and watching your business grow as a result!
Excited yet? Let’s make fixed-price software development projects work for you!
